I have stared a vote on this topic. -- Hari Shreedharan
On Friday, July 13, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > +1 for using Git as primary source control system. > > Thanks Hari for following up on this. > > Regards, > Arvind Prabhakar > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Leslin <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > +1 for this proposal. Git is fine for me. I never back to SVN after I > > touched git. > > > > 2012/7/12 Mike Percy <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected] > > > (mailto:[email protected]) > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > IMO the person who wrote the code is the one who should get credit. > > > > > > Of course they should get the credit for the work. > > > > > > Anyone who has ever performed a careful code review knows that it can be > > > time-consuming work. I assume that's one reason why we currently list > > > > > > > both > > > the author and the committer in the commit message. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > Leslin
