Hari, You're correct that a -1 vote does not veto a release. A savvy user could delete one of the jars before deploying to production, but why make them do that.
Thanks for the commit. Regards, Mike On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Hari Shreedharan <hshreedha...@cloudera.com > wrote: > Mike, > > I committed your patch for flume-1.4, and trunk. > > > Brock: As I posted on the jira, if you want it committed to flume-1.3. the > RM should decide if another RC is required (looks like there are 3 PMC +1 > already, unless someone withdraws the +1). If required, please cherry-pick > the patch to flume-1.3.0 and roll another RC. > > > Thanks, > Hari > > -- > Hari Shreedharan > > > On Saturday, November 17, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Mike Percy wrote: > > > When I was reviewing the libs I noticed that netty is in there twice > with 2 > > different versions. I don't think we should ship like that. > > > > So, -1 from me on this RC. > > > > Details and a patch are here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1723 > > > > Regards, > > Mike > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com(mailto: > br...@cloudera.com)> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Hari, I have created FLUME-1722 for this purpose. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1722 > > > > > > Brock > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Hari Shreedharan > > > <hshreedha...@cloudera.com (mailto:hshreedha...@cloudera.com)> wrote: > > > > +1. > > > > > > > > Here is what I checked: > > > > 1. Checksums and signatures look good. > > > > 2. Verified license file, readme, change log and notice file (more on > > > > > > > > > > this below). > > > > 3. Built, ran unit tests, ran an agent with the sample config - looks > > > > > > good. > > > > > > > > > > > > Additional notes: > > > > The LICENSE file seems to list three libraries which we do not pull > in: > > > > > > > > commons logging > > > > http-client > > > > http-core > > > > > > > > > > > > We probably should remove these from the license file too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hari > > > > -- > > > > Hari Shreedharan > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, November 17, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Alexander Alten-Lorenz > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > - Alex > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Will McQueen <w...@cloudera.com(mailto: > w...@cloudera.com) (mailto: > > > w...@cloudera.com (mailto:w...@cloudera.com))> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 on the release > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Brock Noland > > > > > > <br...@cloudera.com(mailto: > br...@cloudera.com)(mailto: > > > br...@cloudera.com (mailto:br...@cloudera.com))> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Jarek, I don't think it's a blocker but we should > definitely > > > fix it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FWIW, hadoop's LICENSE.txt doesn't even list the licenses of > > > binaries > > > > > > > and Crunch was just released with many defects to this file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho < > > > jar...@apache.org (mailto:jar...@apache.org)> wrote: > > > > > > > > I've noticed that LICENSE file contains entry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > protobuf-<version>.jar whereas our binary artifacts seems to be pulling > > > protobuf-java-<version>.jar (filled FLUME-1720 [1]). It do need seems > as a > > > blocker to me, but it would be great if someone else with more deeper > > > licensing knowledge would confirm that. As long as this is fine, I'm > +1 on > > > the release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Checked: > > > > > > > > * Checksums, signatures seems fine > > > > > > > > * "mvn clean compile test verify package" passes for source > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > artifact > > > > > > > > * "mvn verify" passes for binary artifact > > > > > > > > * CHANGELOG, NOTICE, README, DEVNOTES files seems fine to me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Notes: > > > > > > > > * Filled FLUME-1719: Example export command in README do not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > properly close the string > > > > > > > > * Filled FLUME-1720: LICENSE file contain entry for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > protobuf-<version>.jar, however proper artifact name is > > > protobuf-java-<version>.jar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jarcec > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Links: > > > > > > > > 1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1720 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:49:13AM +0100, Alexander > Alten-Lorenz > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > looks good to me, thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 2012, at 12:21 AM, Brock Noland < > br...@cloudera.com (mailto:br...@cloudera.com)(mailto: > > > br...@cloudera.com (mailto:br...@cloudera.com))> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 verified sigs, hashes, built docs, and verified smoke > test > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Brock Noland < > > > br...@cloudera.com (mailto:br...@cloudera.com)> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This is the second release for Apache Flume as a > top-level > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project, > > > > > > > > > > > version 1.3.0. We are voting on release candidate rc3. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The list of fixed issues: > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=656e049981df62316e0a817382087297209bf2f3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and > checksums > > > (*.md5, *.sha1) > > > > > > > > > > > for the source and binary artifacts can be found at: > > > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~brock/flume-1.3.0-rc3/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Note: attempting to deploy the artifacts to Nexus > appears > > > to have > > > > > > > > > > > locked me out of Apache LDAP so you'll have to use the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > artifacts from > > > > > > > > > > > the above link or via the source tag below.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted on: > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=656e049981df62316e0a817382087297209bf2f3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The KEYS file can be found here: > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flume/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Alexander Alten-Lorenz > > > > > > > > > http://mapredit.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Alexander Alten-Lorenz > > > > > http://mapredit.blogspot.com > > > > > German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - > > > http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/ > > > > > > > > > > > >
