Hi Mike,

Thanks for the response. Would be cool if we get that sorted out.

I've asked Yonghao Zou to submit the Pull Request, since he did most of the 
work and should get the credit.
He'll  do so after the Chinese New Year's Eve.

I will then issue a Pull request for the new ES Rest client, which is dependent 
on the above work.

best regards,

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Percy [mailto:mpe...@apache.org] 
Sent: Dienstag, 13. Februar 2018 04:30
To: dev@flume.apache.org
Subject: Re: Merge of patch in Flume-3021?

Hi Helmut,
I see that I neglected to follow up on the other thread on this topic after 
your reply about SolrServer missing from the solrj jar. Let me ask around w/ 
some folks I know that work on Solr and see if there is any way to retain the 
SolrServer for our tests after upgrading to the new version.

Thank you very much for working on upgrading Solr. Would you mind submitting a 
pull request with your (apparently work-in-progress) patch to upgrade both Solr 
and ES?

To reply to your email in this thread, the JAR packaging situation is largely 
the same after merging FLUME-2957 so unfortunately most of what I noted in my 
reply in the other thread ( https://s.apache.org/GqcX ) still holds.

I hope that we can upgrade the Solr dependencies as part of the same commit as 
the ES dependencies to avoid worrying about which lucene jar is first in the 
classpath, and ensure we are not adding any additional dependency conflicts to 
mvn dependency:tree.


On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Wahrmann, Helmut <helmut.wahrm...@rsa.com>

> Hi,
> now that the blocker for FLUME-3021 is removed by committing 
> FLUME-2957, can we get the patch from 3021 merged to trunk?
> Thanks,
> Helmut

Reply via email to