Late to this thread, but wanted to offer my 2 cents. Having done several releases, the search and bulk edit features of Jira were really key and I think using GH issues would be painful. Although if we cleaned up old issues it wouldn't be as big a deal.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:44 PM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote: > Thanks Christopher. It will be very nice to get access to more GH > functionality. > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > Okay, seems like there's consensus here. I've opened an issue: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14121 > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:35 AM Mike Walch <mwa...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> +1. It would be great to be able to modify/label issues. > >> > >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:09 PM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > > Hi all, it looks like https://gitbox.apache.org is up and running. > >> > > > >> > > From what I understand, this provides bi-directional mirroring > between > >> > > GitHub repos and ASF repos, and would allow us to manage GitHub > issues > >> > and > >> > > PRs by adding labels and milestones to them. > >> > > > >> > > I think Fluo could really benefit from this, especially since we're > >> > already > >> > > using GitHub for issue tracking, and we really need labels and > >> > milestones. > >> > > > >> > > I think we should put in a request to transition our repos over from > >> the > >> > > current git service. They have replied to me that they'll work > requests > >> > on > >> > > a first-come first-serve basis. > >> > > >> >
