I think Mike was trying to reply to my similar thread about this same topic on Accumulo's Dev list, which uses JIRA. Fluo doesn't use JIRA.
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:02 AM Michael Wall <[email protected]> wrote: > Late to this thread, but wanted to offer my 2 cents. Having done several > releases, the search and bulk edit features of Jira were really key and I > think using GH issues would be painful. Although if we cleaned up old > issues it wouldn't be as big a deal. > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:44 PM Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks Christopher. It will be very nice to get access to more GH > > functionality. > > > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Okay, seems like there's consensus here. I've opened an issue: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14121 > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:35 AM Mike Walch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> +1. It would be great to be able to modify/label issues. > > >> > > >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:09 PM Keith Turner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Christopher <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > Hi all, it looks like https://gitbox.apache.org is up and > running. > > >> > > > > >> > > From what I understand, this provides bi-directional mirroring > > between > > >> > > GitHub repos and ASF repos, and would allow us to manage GitHub > > issues > > >> > and > > >> > > PRs by adding labels and milestones to them. > > >> > > > > >> > > I think Fluo could really benefit from this, especially since > we're > > >> > already > > >> > > using GitHub for issue tracking, and we really need labels and > > >> > milestones. > > >> > > > > >> > > I think we should put in a request to transition our repos over > from > > >> the > > >> > > current git service. They have replied to me that they'll work > > requests > > >> > on > > >> > > a first-come first-serve basis. > > >> > > > >> > > >
