I am not 100% sure about the versioning scheme but I don't think it should match Fluo. The version is at 0.8.0 right now. I would like to make it 1.0.0 for first release and have the scripts and configuration files follow semver.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:48 PM Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, I see. Seems like a good idea. Out of curiosity, what kind of > versioning scheme did you have in mind? > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:38 PM Mike Walch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes. Fluo-yarn will be on a different release schedule. A new release > of > > Fluo should in most cases not require a new release of fluo-yarn. New > > releases of fluo-yarn will most likely be necessary to upgrade Apache > Twill > > to support newer releases of Hadoop YARN. > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Is the idea to have fluo-yarn on a different release cycle? > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:52 PM Mike Walch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to create new repo (called 'fluo-yarn') using Gitbox to > > hold > > > > code for launching Fluo applications in YARN. This is related to my > > > recent > > > > pull request [1]. Does anyone have any objections to this? > > > > > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-fluo/pull/883 > > > > > > > > > >
