+1. I like the idea of moving the documentation to the website. On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:49 PM Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Mike Walch <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes. Fluo-yarn will be on a different release schedule. A new release > of > > This is off topic, but reading this made me think : Moving the > documentation from the Fluo repo to the website will make it easier to > document using Fluo+YARN, Fluo+Mesos, etc. > > > Fluo should in most cases not require a new release of fluo-yarn. New > > releases of fluo-yarn will most likely be necessary to upgrade Apache > Twill > > to support newer releases of Hadoop YARN. > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Is the idea to have fluo-yarn on a different release cycle? > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:52 PM Mike Walch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > I would like to create new repo (called 'fluo-yarn') using Gitbox to > hold > >> > code for launching Fluo applications in YARN. This is related to my > >> recent > >> > pull request [1]. Does anyone have any objections to this? > >> > > >> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-fluo/pull/883 > >> > > >> >
