Ross Gardler wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Message: > > > > The following issue has been reopened. > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >View the issue: > > http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-335 > > This issue was originally closed as it is a duplicate of FOR-340, any > reason why it was reopened?
Because it had good comments about the issue. Also the title of FOR-340 doesn't explain what the issue is and 335 puts a definite issue on the 0.7 roadmap (with it closed it looked like the job was done). It doesn't hurt to have them both open. --David
