Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
Sorry for being pain in the a***, but I need some enhancement suggestion because I am relative happy with the concept but not really with my implementation (it is still proof of concept). ;-)
As NKB said, just get on with it, we can always change later. Is the plugin marked with its status in some way, so that people don't rely on it when it goes out with the 0.7 release?
We have plugin version numbers in the plugins.xml. I'd suggest that we follow the same version numbering as core, i.e.
0.1-dev 0.1 0.2-dev 0.2
I'll make the index page for the plugins put all the ones with a "*.*-*" version number in a separate section from those with a "*.*" version number, I'll also put a nice big Warning note at the start of the section.
Ross
