Ross Gardler wrote: > As has been agreed all plugins are to be renamed so that they conform > with our naming convention. However, is the naming convention right? > > Currently we say: > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.NAME-input > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.NAME-output > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.NAME-internal > > > Wouldn't it make more sense as: > > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.NAME > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.NAME > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.NAME
I agree. Actually, i had already wondered that when last we spoke about the naming convention, but i just assumed that there was a reason for the former. --David
