On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 09:54 +1000, David Crossley wrote: > Ross Gardler wrote: > > As has been agreed all plugins are to be renamed so that they conform > > with our naming convention. However, is the naming convention right? > > > > Currently we say: > > > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.NAME-input > > > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.NAME-output > > > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.NAME-internal > > > > > > Wouldn't it make more sense as: > > > > > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.NAME > > > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.NAME > > > > org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.NAME > > I agree. Actually, i had already wondered that when last > we spoke about the naming convention, but i just assumed > that there was a reason for the former. > > --David
WHY do we want to include input/... in the naming? salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd)
