> I *really* like it. Especially if it is using views. Fantastic! Thanks :)
> Some observations: > > http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker/articles/index.html The first bullet in > the lists (not the TOC) have a blank line. > > http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker/articles/why-forrest.html (and many > other pages) there is a change in font towards the end of "Take One". I > think this is to do with an unclosed anchor in the TOC. > > I'm not sure I like the visited links font, it seems to get lost > alongside the unvisited links. However, I understand why you have done > this and I may grow to like it. Perhaps the contrast between visited and > unvisited links is just a bit too extreme. > > Overall a superb skin, and very exciting because it is built with views > rather than the "old fashioned" skinning system. Actually something is terribly wrong with the recent versions of Firefox. They don't render the skin correctly. I have validated the XHTML on validator.w3.org and apart from the namespace issue, the skin validates *perfectly*. Konqueror has no problems rendering it either. Both the issues that you mentioned (the space in the first TOC entry and the change in font) are a result of that. If you look at the DOM tree under Firefox, for some strange reason it is not constructing the DOM tree properly. I'm still trying to figure out the reason. But check out the theme in konqueror and you should see it as I see it here :) The other "guiding principle" in my theme is to NOT dictate the fonts used. I only specify the generic font family (sans, serif, monospace) if at all, so that the user can use his/her favourite defaults. In the skin, the only difference between visited and unvisited links is the bold font weight. Other than that fonts should not be different. Thanks for the feedback, I'll submit a patch soon :) -- Diwaker Gupta http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker
