Ross Gardler wrote:
I completely agree that no design discussion should be carried out on
anthing other than EMail.
I agree that we should frown upon the use of any communication that is
not carried out via email, but do not agree that it is possible to
always follow that rule.
When we meet at ApacheCon will we have to sit in silence and communicate
via IRC because some community memebers will not be present? (obvioulsy
you are not suggesting this, I'm merely trying to illustrate that
sometimes rules have to be broken)
I will not vote against the creation of an IRC channel (as long as the
bot is in place), but I do not want anyone to think that a lack of a
vote against implies that I think it is a good idea, it only means that
it *may* be useful one day, just as Skype is useful sometimes too.
some experience from lenya: the irc channel is more a watering hole
where people lurk and banter than have design decisions.
it has helped community members to know each other better. i do not
think it poses a danger of fragmentation.
i actually would be happier if the cocoon and lenya channels would merge
(the traffic is not very high ,and the cross-pollination would be good).
same for forrest
as for skype, i have used it in one on one situations to get a fellow
dev set up with eclipse, for instance. i do not think it is useful for
groups.
- Re: [RT] IRC vs. Skype Gregor J. Rothfuss
-