Addi a écrit :
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
The naming convention for the plugins is fine, but I think it would
be nice if users are able to declare required plugins using simpler
names like "pdf", "text", "docbook" and so on.
We can figure out what simple names exactly to use later. I just
wanted to see what people feel about this? It should be trivial to
implement (though I have _no_ clue how! :-D), and I think it'll make
config much less intimidating (even I get scared typing
org.apache.forrest.input.viewHelper.xhtml.ls)
Diwaker
Yup, I have to say I agree. It is also a pain when going to the
plugin dir in linux to manually install the plugin because I like to
use tab to finish out long filenames but I pretty much have to type
the whole thing in since they all start with the same long name before
getting to the actual useful part of the name.
I think somethink like "cd *pdf" in $FORREST_HOME/plugins drives you to
"org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.pdf " - it's not so long ;-)
Cyriaque,
- Addi
- Re: user-friendly plugin names Cyriaque Dupoirieux
-
