Ross Gardler wrote: > Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > >Ross Gardler wrote: > > > >>>Are you gonna suggest the new release or should I? > > > >>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=111986901417286&w=2 > > > >Sorry, I was a bit terse. > > > >What I meant to say is exactly along the lines that Ross quoted here > >(thanks, I'll add the title of Mc. Quickfind :-)). > > > >In other words: Now that we are back to a working trunk, let's start > >working on 0.8 M1 with the locationmap as the only feature. > > We've done quite a bit of design work since that mail was written. > Here's what I propose now (almost the same, but considering what has > been said regarding the XHTML2 move): > > 0.8 - refactored sitemaps to utilise locationmap > 0.9 - core as a plugin framework (all input/output code to plugins) > 0.10 - views integration (which incorporate the move to XHTML2 subset) > 1.0 - a big tidy up of JIRA issues > > I see the 0.8 and 0.9 releases as being fairly rapid. They are not huge > jobs.
I like the idea of releasing in stages, rather than a huge bang with many new or changed functionality. > It is the 0.10 work that will take lots of time (at least I > believe so). And then perhaps 0.11, 0.12 for bugfixing. We need to be sure that 1.0 is robust. > We should do parallel development on the 0.8/0.9 releases and the > views/xhtml2 work (done in plugins, yes I changed my mind). What caused you to change your mind? You almost had me convinced that doing the work in a development branch was the way to go. > We keep trunk stable up until the 1.0-dev work. At this point we move > have a stable branch and a trunk for integration of views into core. > This is likely to end up in an unstable trunk for a time. Sorry, i cannot parse that paragraph. Did you mean to say "until the 0.10-dev work"? Also i got confused about which bit is "stable" and what stable means. -David
