Gav.... wrote: > > From: David Crossley (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > There were validation problems with glossary.xml file. These issues were > > noted as Todo items in the glossary plugin's status.xml file. I made a > > quick workaround to the glosarry DTD (see svn r393691) to enable multiple > > "see" and "definition" elements. Don't know if the xml needs better > > structure, e.g. <definitions><definition><definition> > > Up to you, I don't see that it matters, now that <definition> can be > declared multiple times as a child of item, that is fine. I guess there is > going to be more often than not, more than one definition of an item. > > For clarity, and to match what you have done with notes, we can add a parent > <definitions> .
Not up to me. If someone wants changes then they can provide a patch. I was just stating that i was taking the easy way out. I could not commit your patch until i had fixed the validation errors. It broke site-author generation. We need to improve the glossary sample in the plugin so that it triggers all possible validation errors. > > Regarding the patch for glossary-to-document.xsl ... Wouldn't it be > > better to use CSS rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyway we should address > > that as a > > separate general issue. > > Yes I can do that, where would the glossary.css file o, in the /stylesheets/ > directory ? Please look to the FAQ for common questions. http://forrest.apache.org/faq.html => Find in page: css I have not tried it with plugins. Remember that we don't know all the answers. We just explore first, then ask questions. -David
