Thorsten Scherler wrote:
El mié, 19-04-2006 a las 20:34 +0100, Ross Gardler escribió:
...
Of course, there is a nice big warning on there. What do other devs
think? Is this the top of a slippery slope? Should this contract be part
of a FAQ rather than included code?
I'll certainly consider switching to a -0 if people want to see this,
but I strongly caution against it. In my opinion it undermines the whole
purpose of Forrest.
Please call a vote on it to make sure we stand on common ground. If
forrest do not want to include the contract I will make it available on
a non-asf server. No problem at all.
No need for a vote, lets just gauge consensus. You've put it in now, and
the only other opinions stated have been for keeping it. I'm happy to go
with lazy consensus on this one.
Ross
