don't know what you mean (see attachment: Thunderbird gets it right)
and whom ... me?! might be Ferdinand, see below
I believe this is not intentional,
cheers
Johannes
Header bits
-----------
Ross' former message:
message-id= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ferdinand's reply:
message-id= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
in-reply-to= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> !?
references=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ross' reply: in-reply-to= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
my reply: in-reply-to= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
message-id= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ferdinand: in-reply-to= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lots of references as well
Ross Gardler schrieb:
Can we please avoid the increasing tendency to top-post. It loses the context of the email and makes it difficult to follow things in the archives (which is often our documentation).Ross
-- User Interface Design GmbH, Ludwigsburg (Germany) Phone/Fax +49 7141 37700-46/-99, Mobile +49 170 4914567 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] * www.uidesign.de Offices: Martin-Luther-Straße 57-59, D-71636 Ludwigsburg Truderinger Strasse 330, D-81825 Muenchen Friedrichsring 46, D-68161 Mannheim Hansastraße 7-11, 44137 Dortmund Legal information according to EHUG: User Interface Design GmbH; Managing Directors: Dr. Claus Goerner, Franz Koller; Head office: Ludwigsburg; Commercial register of the local court of Stuttgart, Germany, HRB 205519 +++ UID auf der CeBit 2008: Erleben Sie User Experience Management! Stand A20 "UX08" in Halle 9. http://www.uid.com/cebit2008 +++
<<inline: no-top-post.png>>
