On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:41:53PM +1100, David Crossley wrote: > Tim Williams wrote: > > > > It seems that we forgot to update our Jetty version and it's *really* > > old. It's not technically a blocker and we wouldn't recommend a > > production deployment using our embedded Jetty anyway, but it's > > embarrassingly old. I don't know what's involved in updating it but > > it shouldn't be that difficult. Anyway, I could go either way on this > > one. > > There are various things that we should have upgraded, e.g. Ant. > > Yeah it would be great to have upgraded Jetty. I did try at various > stages, but cannot remember why i was not successful.
Launching Jetty is done differently in current versions. Our configuration file would also need to be redone. I'm working on this now. > The old one works at the moment, good on it. If someone manages > to get it upgraded, and if we need a new RC for other reasons > then i reckon that we should include it. Otherwise IMO do a new > release for 0.10 soon after, to update various supporting products. > > -David