On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:41:53PM +1100, David Crossley wrote:
> Tim Williams wrote:
> > 
> > It seems that we forgot to update our Jetty version and it's *really*
> > old.  It's not technically a blocker and we wouldn't recommend a
> > production deployment using our embedded Jetty anyway, but it's
> > embarrassingly old.  I don't know what's involved in updating it but
> > it shouldn't be that difficult.  Anyway, I could go either way on this
> > one.
> 
> There are various things that we should have upgraded, e.g. Ant.
> 
> Yeah it would be great to have upgraded Jetty. I did try at various
> stages, but cannot remember why i was not successful.

Launching Jetty is done differently in current versions. Our
configuration file would also need to be redone. I'm working on this
now.

> The old one works at the moment, good on it. If someone manages
> to get it upgraded, and if we need a new RC for other reasons
> then i reckon that we should include it. Otherwise IMO do a new
> release for 0.10 soon after, to update various supporting products.
> 
> -David