Lots of people still embed antique copies of Jetty. They have this annoying tendency to just work.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Brian M Dube <bd...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:41:53PM +1100, David Crossley wrote: >> Tim Williams wrote: >> > >> > It seems that we forgot to update our Jetty version and it's *really* >> > old. It's not technically a blocker and we wouldn't recommend a >> > production deployment using our embedded Jetty anyway, but it's >> > embarrassingly old. I don't know what's involved in updating it but >> > it shouldn't be that difficult. Anyway, I could go either way on this >> > one. >> >> There are various things that we should have upgraded, e.g. Ant. >> >> Yeah it would be great to have upgraded Jetty. I did try at various >> stages, but cannot remember why i was not successful. > > Launching Jetty is done differently in current versions. Our > configuration file would also need to be redone. I'm working on this > now. > >> The old one works at the moment, good on it. If someone manages >> to get it upgraded, and if we need a new RC for other reasons >> then i reckon that we should include it. Otherwise IMO do a new >> release for 0.10 soon after, to update various supporting products. >> >> -David >
