I fixed the issue where the search box doesn't get prepopulated. I also upgraded some of the npm packages. If you are on an old version of NodeJS, you should upgrade (should be at least 0.12.4)
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Cool, thanks! Ivy is working now : ) > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> BTW, you can now update the site by committing into the "asf-site" >> branch of the "site" repo. As you will see when you check it out, it >> contains the files on the web server as is. >> >> >> Sunday, November 29, 2015, 1:36:32 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> >> > I have fixed the Ivy repo checksum issue (was a CRLF VS LF problem). >> > Delete docgen/.ivy and try again! >> > >> > >> > Saturday, November 28, 2015, 7:48:12 PM, Lee wrote: >> > >> >> I'm looking at it right now actually... >> >> >> >> Also, I can't get docgen to build on my windows machine: >> >> >> >> >> >> [ivy:retrieve] >> >> [ivy:retrieve] :: problems summary :: >> >> [ivy:retrieve] :::: WARNINGS >> >> [ivy:retrieve] problem while downloading module descriptor: >> >> >> http://freemarker.org/repos/ivy/org.freemarker/freemarker/ivy-2.3-branch-head.xml: >> invalid sha1: ex >> >> pected=fc7faac4643441acd716abe4f05f635d813c2b74 >> >> computed=41ac97d45442e9b4cdda55f221d3c47b329159e2 (1084ms) >> >> [ivy:retrieve] module not found: >> >> org.freemarker#freemarker;2.3-branch-head >> >> [ivy:retrieve] ==== freemarker-devel-webserver: tried >> >> [ivy:retrieve] >> >> >> http://freemarker.org/repos/ivy/org.freemarker/freemarker/ivy-2.3-branch-head.xml >> >> [ivy:retrieve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: >> >> [ivy:retrieve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES :: >> >> [ivy:retrieve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: >> >> [ivy:retrieve] :: >> >> org.freemarker#freemarker;2.3-branch-head: not found >> >> [ivy:retrieve] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: >> >> [ivy:retrieve] >> >> [ivy:retrieve] >> >> [ivy:retrieve] :: USE VERBOSE OR DEBUG MESSAGE LEVEL FOR MORE DETAILS >> >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Something is off with Google Custom Search... maybe it's a local or >> >> temporal issue, I don't know. >> >> >> >> As an experiment, try to search for "Using FreeMarker with servlets" >> >> with quotation marks(!). For me, it won't find the page whose title >> >> that is. Instead it finds a dozen of pages where that expression >> >> occurs in the side ToC (which ideally should not be considered at >> >> all). On the same time, plain Google gives the desired page as first >> >> hit. >> >> >> >> Also, now I get JavaDoc hits mixed with Manual hits, despite of what I >> >> have experienced earlier (no search in JavaDoc). It's not necessarily >> >> bad, I just didn't know that we have changed this... did we? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> Daniel Dekany >> >> >> >> >> >> Saturday, November 21, 2015, 9:49:29 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: >> >> >> >>> In practice I have found some problems with search on freemarker.org: >> >>> >> >>> - I can't search in the API java docs. >> >>> >> >>> - When I search in the Manual, I often also want hits from the API >> >>> JavaDocs, though getting them wouldn't be logical because of the >> >>> structure of the site. >> >>> >> >>> - There's no search box on the Home tab. People my not realize that >> >>> there's on on the Manual tab. >> >>> >> >>> So I think we need a global search box, which by default searches in >> >>> the Manual and in the JavaDocs too. It would be a plus if it has >> >>> "API" and "Manual" check boxes. So that would address all the point >> >>> above. >> >>> >> >>> Where to put the global search box (layout...) is a trickier >> >>> question. Certainly the Contribut-Report-Download thing had to go >> >>> away to give space to it, but instead perhaps we could make them >> >>> more apparent in the side menu (with some icons or whatever). And >> >>> then on the Manual there will be a void in place of search... I >> >>> don't know. Can you figure out something awesome? >> >>> >> >>> - The search box is no re-filled after search, so I can't refine my >> >>> search. >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >> >
