Thanks, it seems to work now!

We have this issue that the left-side menu is indexed. I'm not sure if
that can be solved though. I hope Google at least gives it a very low
weight.


Wednesday, December 9, 2015, 10:45:03 PM, Lee wrote:

> Fixed! I needed to update the url... also I need to transfer the search.
> It's still using the key that only I own, as opposed to both of us.
>
> It's going to return results from `freemarker.incubator.apache.org` btw
> (that was one of the issues)
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> BTW, the Google Custom Search still behaves rather strangely. Like if
>> I repeat the original experiment, searching for "Using FreeMarker with
>> servlets" with quotation marks, now it only gives one hit,
>> http://freemarker.incubator.apache.org/docs/xgui_declarative.html,
>> which doesn't even contain that expression. I don't know what's wrong
>> with it... maybe the domain change has driven it crazy? (I have asked
>> Infra to make freemarker.org canonical about 2 weeks ago, but there's
>> no reaction so far.)
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>  Daniel Dekany
>>
>>
>> Sunday, November 29, 2015, 6:59:07 AM, Lee wrote:
>>
>> > I fixed the issue where the search box doesn't get prepopulated. I also
>> > upgraded some of the npm packages. If you are on an old version of
>> NodeJS,
>> > you should upgrade (should be at least 0.12.4)
>> >
>> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Cool, thanks! Ivy is working now : )
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> BTW, you can now update the site by committing into the "asf-site"
>> >>> branch of the "site" repo. As you will see when you check it out, it
>> >>> contains the files on the web server as is.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Sunday, November 29, 2015, 1:36:32 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > I have fixed the Ivy repo checksum issue (was a CRLF VS LF problem).
>> >>> > Delete docgen/.ivy and try again!
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Saturday, November 28, 2015, 7:48:12 PM, Lee wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> I'm looking at it right now actually...
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Also, I can't get docgen to build on my windows machine:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve] :: problems summary ::
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve] :::: WARNINGS
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]  problem while downloading module descriptor:
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://freemarker.org/repos/ivy/org.freemarker/freemarker/ivy-2.3-branch-head.xml
>> :
>> >>> invalid sha1: ex
>> >>> >> pected=fc7faac4643441acd716abe4f05f635d813c2b74
>> >>> >> computed=41ac97d45442e9b4cdda55f221d3c47b329159e2 (1084ms)
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]          module not found:
>> >>> >> org.freemarker#freemarker;2.3-branch-head
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]  ==== freemarker-devel-webserver: tried
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]
>> >>> >>
>> >>>
>> http://freemarker.org/repos/ivy/org.freemarker/freemarker/ivy-2.3-branch-head.xml
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]
>> ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]          ::          UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES
>>  ::
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]
>> ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]          ::
>> >>> >> org.freemarker#freemarker;2.3-branch-head: not found
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]
>> ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve]
>> >>> >> [ivy:retrieve] :: USE VERBOSE OR DEBUG MESSAGE LEVEL FOR MORE
>> DETAILS
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]
>> >
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >> Something is off with Google Custom Search... maybe it's a local or
>> >>> >> temporal issue, I don't know.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> As an experiment, try to search for "Using FreeMarker with servlets"
>> >>> >> with quotation marks(!). For me, it won't find the page whose title
>> >>> >> that is. Instead it finds a dozen of pages where that expression
>> >>> >> occurs in the side ToC (which ideally should not be considered at
>> >>> >> all). On the same time, plain Google gives the desired page as first
>> >>> >> hit.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Also, now I get JavaDoc hits mixed with Manual hits, despite of
>> what I
>> >>> >> have experienced earlier (no search in JavaDoc). It's not
>> necessarily
>> >>> >> bad, I just didn't know that we have changed this... did we?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> Thanks,
>> >>> >>  Daniel Dekany
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Saturday, November 21, 2015, 9:49:29 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> In practice I have found some problems with search on
>> freemarker.org:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> - I can't search in the API java docs.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> - When I search in the Manual, I often also want hits from the API
>> >>> >>>   JavaDocs, though getting them wouldn't be logical because of the
>> >>> >>>   structure of the site.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> - There's no search box on the Home tab. People my not realize that
>> >>> >>>   there's on on the Manual tab.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>   So I think we need a global search box, which by default
>> searches in
>> >>> >>>   the Manual and in the JavaDocs too. It would be a plus if it has
>> >>> >>>   "API" and "Manual" check boxes. So that would address all the
>> point
>> >>> >>>   above.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>   Where to put the global search box (layout...) is a trickier
>> >>> >>>   question. Certainly the Contribut-Report-Download thing had to go
>> >>> >>>   away to give space to it, but instead perhaps we could make them
>> >>> >>>   more apparent in the side menu (with some icons or whatever). And
>> >>> >>>   then on the Manual there will be a void in place of search... I
>> >>> >>>   don't know. Can you figure out something awesome?
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> - The search box is no re-filled after search, so I can't refine my
>> >>> >>>   search.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>>  Daniel Dekany
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Reply via email to