I have fixed the noticed legal and packaging things (no actual change in FreeMarker itself since the last vote), and almost called a new voting, but I have some Maven doubts. I can deploy into the staging repo, but I didn't dare to Close the staging repo because this I don't understand in http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#stage-release-vote: "the project you want to stage must be a SNAPSHOT version". But if it's 2.3.24-rc01-incubating-SNAPSHOT (as opposed to just 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, which it is now), and the vote passes, then I had to build and Maven-deploy a different artifact that's not a SNAPSHOT and wasn't voted on. I don't think that's the intent. So, if I just Close the staging repo, I would think that it doesn't go anywhere "too public", not even if it's non-SNAPSHOT, only if I also "Promote" it. But I don't know. So what artifact version should I use?
Otherwise, here's the new version - anybody spots something wrong with it before the next voting? https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-rc01-incubating/ 2.3-gae commit hash: b968ffaf2b52225e57ec196aaa3ee7345fa0024d https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=b968ffaf2b52225e57ec196aaa3ee7345fa0024d 2.3 commit hash: 9a4f598888c1eec85a0d7b9afb400626ec49f46e https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=9a4f598888c1eec85a0d7b9afb400626ec49f46e Thursday, January 7, 2016, 5:18:20 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > You'll need to to push the release to Maven central, so it's better to >> have >> > it as soon as possible. I already requested it to INFRA, see >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11045 >> >> Sorry if I was misunderstandable. I did that days ago, and in >> principle we have it already. >> > > OK, so I close that issue. No problem, thanks. > > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
