Just to be clear. I do not consider the logo to be a requirement. It is a should. We prefer to see the logo, but its not a requirement as of now. That doesn't mean it won't become a requirement.
John On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:11 PM Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: > There was no attachment in your mail. > > The only information I have found is "Incubator Logo Podlings websites > SHOULD contain the Apache Incubator Project logo as sign of > affiliation.". There's not even link to the logo, not to mention to > the source of the logo (which I suppose is > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/images/egg-logo-source.svg > ). > So the whole thing is totally informal. Surely they won't complain if > you re-rasterize the SVG in a different resolution, nor that if you > remove that black border. > > > Friday, July 1, 2016, 7:39:33 PM, Lee wrote: > > > Hey Sergio, > > > > I'll update the website with the logo. I was thinking of putting it > > in the left column on the website. Is that visible enough? Are we > > allowed to remove the border from the logo? The left-column is 210px > > wide and the logo is 229px. If I remove the border and the > > whitespace then it's 207px and fits nicely (see attached). If we > > can't remove the border, can we resize it? > > > > Thanks, > > Evangelia > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Those who follow general@incubator, IPMC has started (led by John D. > > Ament) to audit podlings' branding: > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016 > > > > FreeMarker is fine. But "Podlings websites SHOULD contain the Apache > > Incubator Project logo as sign of affiliation". Since it's a "SHOULD" is > > fine; but I'd recommend to add the Incubator logo somewhere in the site > > template. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Sergio Fernández > > Partner Technology Manager > > Redlink GmbH > > m: +43 6602747925 > > e: [email protected] > > w: http://redlink.co > > > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > >
