There's no FreeMarker 3. The minimal goal of FM 3 is to get rid of historical mistakes that we can't fix now because of backward compatibility constraints. This meant to lead to significant better quality all over, and to a code base that's easier (and more fun) to contribute to. I'm also thinking about more ambitious changes, such as supporting smarter whitespace control (which means that we can't just use plain Writer-s anymore, except at the final stage), or even more radical changes, like making the language more static and hence more tooling-friendly, or even things like using a MOP instead of ObjectWrapping... but first things first, these are too far away to speak about.
Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 11:05:30 PM, Ingo Mahnke wrote: > Ok. I use IntelliJ. I saw your readme file and will try to install. > > One other question: > We are currently using Freemarker 2x. What is new or better in Freemarker 3? > > > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2016 um 19:39 Uhr >> Von: "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]> >> An: "Ingo Mahnke" <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: Re: [DISCUSS] graduation >> >> Of course it is. >> >> >> Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 3:26:59 PM, Ingo Mahnke wrote: >> >> > Hallo and thank you. >> > is this possible: I could out the freemaker 2.x source and try fix an easy >> > bug. >> > >> > Ingo >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juli 2016 um 19:07 Uhr >> >> Von: "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]> >> >> An: "Ingo Mahnke" <[email protected]> >> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [DISCUSS] graduation >> >> >> >> Just in case you have missed it, there's a few things where we are >> >> looking for help: http://freemarker.org/contribute.html >> >> >> >> (There are also deeper things that aren't listed there, such as an >> >> option for better null handling, or named/multiple nested contents. >> >> I'm not even sure if I will attempt them in the 2.x branch, given the >> >> even increasing pressure for starting a 3.x... otherwise I certainly >> >> would.) >> >> >> >> >> >> Tuesday, July 26, 2016, 12:04:24 PM, Ingo Mahnke wrote: >> >> >> >> > Hallo! >> >> > In our product (an E-Mail Marketing Solution). Freemaker is a very >> >> > importent part in backend >> >> > form our Drag and Drop Newsletter Editor. So like Christoh I also have >> >> > a strong interest >> >> > to support this project. Perhaps in documentation? Or development. >> >> > >> >> > Ingo >> >> > >> >> >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juli 2016 um 10:30 Uhr >> >> >> Von: "Christoph Rüger" <[email protected]> >> >> >> An: [email protected] >> >> >> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] graduation >> >> >> >> >> >> As our product uses freemarker almost everywhere, I also have a strong >> >> >> interest to support this project. I just had a case on SO where Daniel >> >> >> helped me out (regarding error messaging) which could be my first touch >> >> >> point. I first have to get familiar with all the formal topics but I >> >> >> will >> >> >> try. >> >> >> So, I'm in. >> >> >> >> >> >> 2016-07-26 9:41 GMT+02:00 Sergio Fernández <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Is it supposed to be a normal "Voting in a new PPMC member" >> >> >> > > votings as >> >> >> > > described on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html (CC-ed to >> >> >> > > the IPMC and so on). I'm asking because all Mentors are already >> >> >> > > PPMC >> >> >> > > members right now, because that's the initial status of Mentors >> >> >> > > when a >> >> >> > > proddling starts. Should I add some explanation to the voting, like >> >> >> > > that we are voting about who should stay even after graduation, or >> >> >> > > is >> >> >> > > it the normal way of doing this? >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Well, it should be actual a vote for committers. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > But maybe we can make it simpler: on the discussion, just comment >> >> >> > something >> >> >> > like "two mentors already expressed their interest to continue >> >> >> > involved >> >> >> > after graduation". >> >> >> > >> >> >> > So then get get the ball rolling... because in the end is all about >> >> >> > community health, as Jean-Frederic commented. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > What do you think? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > Sergio Fernández >> >> >> > Partner Technology Manager >> >> >> > Redlink GmbH >> >> >> > m: +43 6602747925 >> >> >> > e: [email protected] >> >> >> > w: http://redlink.co >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Christoph Rüger, Geschäftsführer >> >> >> Synesty <https://synesty.com/> - Automatisierung, Schnittstellen, >> >> >> Datenfeeds >> >> >> Tel.: +49 3641/559649 >> >> >> >> >> >> Xing: https://www.xing.com/profile/Christoph_Rueger2 >> >> >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christoph-rueger/a/685/198 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Synesty GmbH >> >> >> Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a >> >> >> 07745 Jena >> >> >> Tel.: +49 3641 559649 >> >> >> Fax.: +49 3641 5596499 >> >> >> Internet: http://synesty.com >> >> >> >> >> >> Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger >> >> >> Unternehmenssitz: Jena >> >> >> Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena >> >> >> Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766 >> >> >> Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982 >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> Daniel Dekany >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >> > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
