I think it's very early to talk about such things now, before we have some kind of early version at least. Most of the possible changes weren't ever discussed, so I don't know if there will be consensus regarding them, or how they will look like. (Let alone seeing them actually implemented.) Of course, as soon as I manage to allocate some serious time for FM3, I will start the basic cleanup and start discussion these things.
Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 6:24:41 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > Well, I was thinking to focus the talk more in the future than in the past. > After a brief introduction to FM2, we could spend time on outlining what > FM3 wants to become. So maybe we can attract new people on board, that's in > the end the goal. What do you think? > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I was thinking about that for the last ApacheCon EU, and concluded >> that while there's quite a few interesting things in templating (in my >> head anyway), FM doesn't yet address to much of them. And even if you >> still manage to raise the attention of someone, the code base (like >> the extra pain needed to add new features) isn't exactly tempting >> because of all of the legacy. This is basically the same issue as with >> graduation. So, I guess we have to skip it yet again. Let's hope the >> FM 3 "sprint" will lead to something more interesting. >> >> >> Monday, August 29, 2016, 10:10:33 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Is there any interest to submit something to ApacheCon EU? CfP closes on >> > September 9th. >> > >> > For community building it'd be really good for the podling. I think it'd >> be >> > much more valuable something form the PPM directly. But if you can't >> travel >> > to Europe, I'm planning to attend anyway, so I could try to represent the >> > project. >> > >> > Cheers, >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >> > > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
