Probably there will be a higher chance for positive answer if we can offer running the service too. Because I guess that's a burden for them, while owning a piece of software on GitHub is not, that's just good PR.
Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 12:53:12 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Le 03/01/2017 à 09:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >> Hi all, >> >> a couple of days ago Daniel brought to my attention the site/service: >> >> http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/ >> >> They provide a nice online tool to evaluate any Freemarker template by >> providing the template code and its context. >> >> Wouldn't be nice is we could offer that or a similar service to the users >> and potential adopters of Freemarker? I think it would be a very useful >> tool and also a good mechanism to attract new consumers. >> >> If there is an interest in this community then we could move in two >> directions: >> >> 1) get in touch with the maintainers of freemarker-online and see if they >> are interested to contribute their work [*] or join our community and help >> to build a similar one here; if they are not interested then we could >> discuss if it would make sense to build our own here >> >> 2) get in touch with the Infra team and explore the possibility to set up a >> virtual machine to dedicated to our project that we could use to deploy a >> similar service, from our official website >> >> I can volunteer to try to get in touch with them (#1); any volunteers for >> #2 (or even #1)? >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Jacopo >> >> [*] which is licensed with the AL2.0 and available here: >> https://github.com/kenshoo/freemarker-online >> > Hi Jacopo, > > I can take care of 2, I'm used to these kind of things for OFBiz > I guess 1 is a prerequisite and I'm not well placed for this task. > > Jacques > > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
