Very cool idea, and I think in worst case scenario not too difficult to
redo the work if needed. It's just one page that calls the parser.

On Jan 3, 2017 3:27 PM, "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Probably there will be a higher chance for positive answer if we can
> offer running the service too. Because I guess that's a burden for
> them, while owning a piece of software on GitHub is not, that's just
> good PR.
>
>
> Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 12:53:12 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
> > Le 03/01/2017 à 09:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> a couple of days ago Daniel brought to my attention the site/service:
> >>
> >> http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/
> >>
> >> They provide a nice online tool to evaluate any Freemarker template by
> >> providing the template code and its context.
> >>
> >> Wouldn't be nice is we could offer that or a similar service to the
> users
> >> and potential adopters of Freemarker? I think it would be a very useful
> >> tool and also a good mechanism to attract new consumers.
> >>
> >> If there is an interest in this community then we could move in two
> >> directions:
> >>
> >> 1) get in touch with the maintainers of freemarker-online and see if
> they
> >> are interested to contribute their work [*] or join our community and
> help
> >> to build a similar one here; if they are not interested then we could
> >> discuss if it would make sense to build our own here
> >>
> >> 2) get in touch with the Infra team and explore the possibility to set
> up a
> >> virtual machine to dedicated to our project that we could use to deploy
> a
> >> similar service, from our official website
> >>
> >> I can volunteer to try to get in touch with them (#1); any volunteers
> for
> >> #2 (or even #1)?
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >>
> >> Jacopo
> >>
> >> [*] which is licensed with the AL2.0 and available here:
> >> https://github.com/kenshoo/freemarker-online
> >>
> > Hi Jacopo,
> >
> > I can take care of 2, I'm used to these kind of things for OFBiz
> > I guess 1 is a prerequisite and I'm not well placed for this task.
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> >
>
> --
> Thanks,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>

Reply via email to