Le 12/11/2017 à 11:29, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
Sunday, November 12, 2017, 9:49:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I agree, I'm just unsure a contributor needs an ICLA for medium
contributions, ie a bit more than fixing typos, like fixing obvious simple bugs.
When something affects the Java code inside freemarker.jar... I just
can't know what new ideas lawyers will have years later.
If it's an obvious bug fix, without functional change, I think it can be considered a
"minor contribution", it's not a new idea.
Contrary to, for instance, improvements, enhancements, refactorings which
should not be considered minor.
Anyway that's purely theoretical, since it's something we can bypass
for specific cases, right?
Yes, but some simple guidelines still should be provided, so there it
is. Especially as these rules can be project-specific.
Yep, I actually already answered positively to this thread.
BTW I did not find for sure the discussion you refer to.
It's here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e7e89eca790799964ba98b6c9d72a6f3320df886ffb07d427648861e@<dev.freemarker.apache.org>
Thanks
Jacques
Jacques
Le 11/11/2017 à 20:04, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
Months ago we had discussion here about when an ICLA or CCLA is needed for
merging Girhub PR. To reflect that, I have updated this part:
https://freemarker.apache.org/committer-howto.html#merging-pull-request
Do you agree? Especially if you are PPMC, it would be good if you
answer.
Also, the left side menu has changed (like here:
https://freemarker.apache.org/ ), as I have removed the
"Miscellaneous" category, and added the "Foundation" category. The
last is to make certain ASF related matters more accessible. The items
that were under "Miscellaneous":
- sf.net project link was removed (nobody should use that anymore)
- "Source code" was moved to Community (doesn't fit elsewhere...)
- "Project history" was moved under "Foundation"
