I'm "a bit" late with this, but I have created the issue for it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/agent/INFRA/issue/INFRA-15775
Friday, December 15, 2017, 1:57:04 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > To summarize, the opininos were (whether we should switch to > try.freemarker.apache.org): > - Daniel Dekany: We better not risk not doing this > - Jacopo Cappellato: Agrees with me (above) in this > - Jacques Le Roux: No opinion was expressed, but it's technically fine > - Ralph Goers: It's certainly not necessary to do > > So, unless someone has more to add, I will ask this from Infra in the > coming days... just to be on the safe side. > > Wednesday, November 29, 2017, 6:38:05 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> The difference is that try.freemarker.org >> <http://try.freemarker.org/> is a companion site. So long as the >> main site is freemarker.apache.org I don’t think anyone will complain about >> a companion site. >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:33 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ralph, >>> >>> IIRW openoffice.org is an exception. There are others, when the domain was >>> well established before entering the incubator, subversion.org comes to >>> mind. >>> >>> IMO freemarker.org was well established before entering the incubator but >>> not try.freemarker.apache.org which is quite recent. Hence maybe some >>> caution needed... >>> >>> My 2 cts >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> Le 29/11/2017 à 14:55, Ralph Goers a écrit : >>>> Personally, I don’t see why there should be a problem as long as >>>> try.freemarker.org <http://try.freemarker.org/> is an Apache controlled >>>> domain. You aren’t the only project that has a vanity domain. See >>>> www.openoffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org/> as an example. >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 1:51 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Just as a reminder, I'm planning to request try.freemarker.apache.org, >>>>> from Infra and then redirect try.freemarker.org to it, because I'm >>>>> worried that the IPMC will dislike that we use try.freemarker.org as >>>>> the canonical address of the online template tester. It will also use >>>>> https and a LetsEncrypt certificate (we can't use the *.apache.org >>>>> cert on a VM). >>>>> >>>>> BTW, using a sub-sub domains is a bit extreme. I'm not aware of any >>>>> gotchas in out case, but if anyone is aware some, like LetsEncrypt >>>>> doesn't support them or something, please stop me! (Also, as this way >>>>> we will receive the cookies of freemarker.apache.org, but certainly we >>>>> will able to cope with that, if it ever causes a problem.) >>>>> >>>>> Any comments? And do you (especially PPMC members) agree? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Daniel Dekany >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
