Wrong link, sorry, correcting. http://jinja.pocoo.org/docs/2.10/templates/#include
On Feb 17, 2018 11:34 AM, "Taher Alkhateeb" <slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote: > For a point of comparison, the python jinja2 template engine (widely used) > has an "include" directive that has an attribute named "ignore missing" > [1]. I also remember seeing similar behavior in other engines. > > So I guess perhaps from a usability point of view this seems to be a > desired feature by users. However, I don't know what the impact in terms of > complexity would reflect in the code base. > > http://jinja.pocoo.org/docs/2.10/templates/#list-of-global-functions > > On Feb 17, 2018 11:18 AM, "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 8:04 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Some more opinions guys? Especially as we got one opinion against the >> > feature. >> > >> >> Just to clarify my opinion: I am not against this feature; I simply don't >> consider it a must since there are some workaround to get a similar >> behavior. But if it will be implemented I will be happy too. >> >> Jacopo >> >
