Github user PurelyApplied commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/652#discussion_r129656012
  
    --- Diff: geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/ExitCode.java 
---
    @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more 
contributor license
    + * agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for 
additional information regarding
    + * copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache 
License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the 
License. You may obtain a
    + * copy of the License at
    + *
    + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software 
distributed under the License
    + * is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF 
ANY KIND, either express
    + * or implied. See the License for the specific language governing 
permissions and limitations under
    + * the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.geode.internal;
    +
    +import java.util.Arrays;
    +
    +import org.springframework.shell.core.ExitShellRequest;
    +
    +
    +public enum ExitCode {
    +
    +  // The choice of redundant values here is to be consistent with existing 
behavior
    +  // while allowing for future extensibility. JVM_TERMINATED_EXIT(99) 
exists for coverage of
    +  // Spring's ExitShellRequest values in fromSpring.
    +  NORMAL(0),
    +  FATAL(1),
    +  DEPENDENCY_GRAPH_FAILURE(-1),
    +  COULD_NOT_EXECUTE_COMMAND(1),
    +  INVALID_COMMAND(1),
    --- End diff --
    
    I agree in principle, but was hesitant to alter existing behavior for 
system exit calls.  I didn't gain any traction in my message to the dev list 
about using any exit codes other than `0` and `1`, but at the same time felt 
that some distinction was warranted in the different places that `System.exit` 
had been called.
    
    Then again, I just finished ripping out dead code that had been in place 
"for future development," so perhaps I should keep it simple for now and not do 
the work of future extensibility that may or may not ever arrive.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to