-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61487/#review182391
-----------------------------------------------------------




geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/management/internal/beans/CacheServerBridge.java
Lines 114-115 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/61487/#comment258280>

    To avoid any confusion, I suggest that the order of the cache and 
cacheServer parameters be the same for this and the preceding constructor. I 
prefer the order decalred here, (cache, cacheServer, ...)


- Ken Howe


On Aug. 8, 2017, 12:19 a.m., Kirk Lund wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61487/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 8, 2017, 12:19 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Emily Yeh, Jinmei Liao, Jared Stewart, Ken Howe, 
> and Patrick Rhomberg.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GEODE-3407
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3407
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Change InternalClientMembership to not synchronize on CacheFactory
> by accepting Cache parameter from CacheServerBridge.
> 
> New regression test confirms bug and this fix.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/tier/InternalClientMembership.java
>  504081d65515adb294dd43ecffee450477f08339 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/management/internal/beans/CacheServerBridge.java
>  728402c8a290d88026db753657e26e5f7440a990 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/management/internal/beans/ServerBridge.java
>  6834998da13deec5e074a61e5373ec2f8dce2ad7 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/management/internal/beans/CacheServerBridgeClientMembershipRegressionTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61487/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> precheckin in progress
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kirk Lund
> 
>

Reply via email to