+1 I've had to reorder the list a few times myself to correct the ordering On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Galen O'Sullivan <gosulli...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I wrote a PR (GEODE-5800) recently to remove redundant cases from > DataSerializer.readObject etc. calls. This changed the bytecode size (but > not the behavior) of a number of DataSerializables, and I realized that the > task of updating the list (or viewing the diff) was made harder by the fact > that our sanctionedDataSerializables list has gotten out of order. I would > like to propose forcing the list (and probably sanctionedSerializables as > well) to be ordered and the files to be equal, as I see no benefit to > having the files out of order, and I do see a benefit to having > configuration files like this rigidly defined so that we can analyze and > read diffs better. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > Galen >