https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17226
> On Dec 5, 2018, at 11:26 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > They are investigating security concerns around the integration. > >> On Dec 5, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> wrote: >> >> Maybe we need to poke infra about this >> >>> On 11/9/18 3:07 PM, Jacob Barrett wrote: >>> I opened a ticket with infra earlier this week to enable PR integration. >>> There hasn’t been any movement. >>> >>>> On Nov 9, 2018, at 3:00 PM, Nabarun Nag <n...@pivotal.io> wrote: >>>> >>>> As per running periodically , LGTM runs it every Monday. >>>> >>>> As for who would fix it, LGTM mentions which commit caused the failure and >>>> who was the author of it. So i think its the author's responsibility to >>>> fix it. >>>> >>>> Personally, LGTM list a table that shows how many alerts we caused by >>>> which author [ https://lgtm.com/projects/g/apache/geode/contributors:java >>>> <https://lgtm.com/projects/g/apache/geode/contributors:java> ] >>>> I cleaning up whatever alerts I have introduced into Apache Geode. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Nabarun >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Nov 9, 2018, at 2:54 PM, Alexander Murmann <amurm...@pivotal.io> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I don't have strong opinions on this, but I am always suspect of CI jobs >>>>> that indicate quality that only run periodically. If the job discovers >>>>> something that needs improvement who is going to do the work and when? >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:36 PM Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, we could run it periodically such as weekly rather than as part of >>>>>> the main pipeline or precheckin. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Aditya Anchuri <aanch...@pivotal.io> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1, although I do wonder about the overhead of making PRs increasing >>>>>>> more >>>>>>> than it already feels like to me as a new contributor (as the person who >>>>>>> made the geospatial contribution). If this was a gradle task maybe like >>>>>>> spotless? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd like to see LGTM run on pull requests. Otherwise I think we're >>>>>>>> fighting a losing battle trying to improve the quality of our code. For >>>>>>>> instance, we just had a nice contribution of geospatial functionality >>>>>>>> that raised 5 alerts, but we only found out about it after the code was >>>>>>>> merged to develop. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LGTM allows that kind of integration but you have to be the repo >>>>>> "owner" >>>>>>>> to set it up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://lgtm.com/projects/g/apache/geode/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
