Udo, do you mind explaining how the RFC process comes into this? Are you suggesting that we should wait if an RFC had a target release attached?
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:47 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@apache.com> wrote: > I don't think we need to wait for this, as there has been no RFC process > followed. > > --Udo > > On 7/22/19 3:38 PM, Jinmei Liao wrote: > > Work is still being planned to move the cluster management rest service > > under an experimental version flag and use a geode property to turn it > > on/off. I would say we are ready to cut the geode 1.10.0 after that work > is > > complete. > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:24 PM Alexander Murmann <amurm...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone! > >> > >> We released Geode 1.9.0 on April 25th. That's about 3 months ago. End of > >> last year we discussed releasing quarterly. In the past we've had about > a > >> month between cutting a release branch and actually shipping our new > minor. > >> This means we are already behind our target release cadence. > >> > >> What are your thoughts on cutting a 1.10.0 release branch this week? > >> > >> Would anyone like to volunteer to be the release manager for geode > 1.10.0? > >> > >> Thank you all! > >> > > >
