Here is the Pull Request for the cherry pick as requested
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4049

-michael

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:28 AM Dick Cavender <dcaven...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Hi Michael, thank you for bringing your concern and fixing this issue.
>
> Geode's release process dictates a time-based schedule <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Schedule> to cut
> release branches.  The “critical fixes” rule does allow critical fixes to
> be brought to the release branch by proposal on the dev list, as you have
> done here.
>
> If there is consensus from the Geode community that your proposed change
> satisfies the “critical fixes” rule, I will be happy to bring it to the
> 1.10.0 release branch.
>
> Due to the complexity of this change, could please open a PR against
> release/1.10.0 containing the exact changes you want to merge?
>
> Regards
>
> -Dick
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:23 AM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > +1 yes please!
> >
> > > On Sep 12, 2019, at 10:11 AM, Michael Oleske <mole...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Geode Devs!
> > >
> > > I'd like to propose including the fix for GEODE-7178.  This resolves an
> > > issue that Ivan (https://markmail.org/message/dwwac42xmpo4xb2e) ran
> > into in
> > > 1.10 RC1.
> > >
> > > SHA: 91176d61df64bf1390cdba7b1cdc2b40cdfaba3a
> > > Link to GitHub:
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/geode/commit/91176d61df64bf1390cdba7b1cdc2b40cdfaba3a
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > -michael
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to