The plan around backwards compatibility makes sense to me. Anthony
> On Oct 6, 2020, at 4:10 PM, Dale Emery <dem...@vmware.com> wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > I spent more than a week scouring Gradle docs and code for any way to give > the parallel forks their own working directories. I couldn't find a way. At > least, not through the public API. And I'm reluctant to rely on internal > APIs, the way our docker and repeat tests do. If this working-dir idea offers > enough resistance, I'll take another look at Gradle. > > Cheers, > Dale > > On 10/6/20, 3:58 PM, "Dan Smith" <dasm...@vmware.com> wrote: > > +1 > > Looks good to me. If this is just for tests, I suspect there is some > gradle way to make parallel forks use different working directories. But > having this option in the product doesn't seem like a bad idea. > > -Dan > ________________________________ > From: Dale Emery <dem...@vmware.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 12:12 PM > To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org> > Subject: [Discussion] RFC to make Geode's working directory configurable > > Hi all, > > I have submitted an RFC to make Geode’s working directory configurable: > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FGEODE%2FMake%2BGeode%2527s%2BWorking%2BDirectory%2BConfigurable&data=02%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C568729496bb94bbafe4108d86a4d1eeb%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637376226749652389&sdata=EWrxpNf8TocLKEtapZQP3P5lMvFwuzTVrS9abs2gy%2Fs%3D&reserved=0 > > Please review it and comment by Oct 26. > > Cheers, > Dale > >
