On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Anthony Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > I suggest we adopt the gitflow model for branching as described in [1] and > [2]. Following an established and consistent pattern for branching makes it > easier for new users and devs to contribute.
+1 - makes sense to me. I personally prefer 'master' to be the unstable version that is always open for commits and having a separate 'stable' branch, but it's bike-shedding at that point. Cheers. -- justin
