On Monday, May 4, 2015, Justin Erenkrantz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Anthony Baker <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > I suggest we adopt the gitflow model for branching as described in [1] > and [2]. Following an established and consistent pattern for branching > makes it easier for new users and devs to contribute. > > +1 - makes sense to me. > > I personally prefer 'master' to be the unstable version that is always > open for commits and having a separate 'stable' branch, but it's > bike-shedding at that point. +1 my point from earlier :-) rgds jan i > > Cheers. -- justin > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
