On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Pid ster <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 7 May 2015, at 19:45, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Pid <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On 07/05/2015 11:40, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>>> Yes, it is expected that these will be renamed by the time Geode is ready
>>>> for graduation from the Incubator.
>>>>
>>>> Years ago, we tried to make projects do this type of rename before
>>>> incubation and it was silly.  So, it is now one of the key criteria for
>>>> exit - not entrance.
>>>
>>> In which case, the question is whether to do this now/soon (before
>>> proliferation of branches) or later (and try to coordinate rebases &
>>> merges if there's branches in progress).
>>>
>>> I am in favour of doing it early.
>>
>> I agree we shouldn't delay too much, but delaying for a few month is
>> fine. Agreed?
>
> It should not be rushed, but I wanted to raise it early because it has
> consequences. Better to talk about it now.

Huge +1 to this! We need to get these types of issues out for the
community to noodle on as soon as possible!

Thanks,
Roman.

Reply via email to