Preferred ought to be *GitHub PRs* followed by *ReviewBoard* code reviews for more complex changes.
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > last bit of infrastructure is finally in place: > https://reviews.apache.org/groups/geode/ > > At this point reviewers of any proposed changes > have three options: > 0. Review patches as they are attached to JIRA > 1. Ask for a Github pull request > 2. Ask for a Reviewboard submission > > #0 is obviously the easiest and I suggest we try > to leverage it often. #1 fits better into GH workflow. > #2 has better UI (or some I am told ;-)). When using > Reviewboard make sure to add geode (as a group) > to the list of reviewers. > > Our inaugural review is this: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/34814/ > > Thanks, > Roman. > -- -John 503-504-8657 john.blum10101 (skype)
