-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37822/#review96766
-----------------------------------------------------------



gemfire-lucene/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/repository/ObjectToDocumentMapper.java
 (line 16)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/37822/#comment152416>

    Given the name of the interface and javaDoc for this method, I thought the 
return type will be a Lucene Document object?



gemfire-lucene/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/repository/ObjectToDocumentMapper.java
 (line 22)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/37822/#comment152418>

    I may not have understood this correctly. Is there one lucene doc per KV? 
If so then there will be a 1-to-1 mapping between Key and docid. DocId is an 
integer. Geode will need to add and delete docId from the index. What is the 
role of Term?



gemfire-lucene/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/repository/RepositoryManager.java
 (line 7)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/37822/#comment152412>

    Can a user can define multiple indexes on a region? If so getRepository 
will need more inputs to return a SingleIndexRepository?



gemfire-lucene/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/repository/SingleIndexRepositoryImpl.java
 (line 22)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/37822/#comment152427>

    This is so confusing. The latest IndexWriter on Lucene trunk has the 
following method:
    public void addDocument(IndexDocument doc)
    
    and origin/lucene_solr_5_3 branch's IndexWriter has this method
    public void addDocument(Iterable<? extends IndexableField> doc)
    
    Is the API going to change?



gemfire-lucene/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/repository/SingleIndexRepositoryImpl.java
 (line 32)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/37822/#comment152421>

    javadoc for writer.deleteDocument = Deletes the document(s) containing any 
of the terms. 
    
    The intent is to remove one document related to key and not to remove all 
documents containing the term.


- Ashvin A


On Aug. 27, 2015, 12:13 a.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/37822/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 27, 2015, 12:13 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Ashvin A and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adding an implementation of the listener and a unit test. I also added
> several other interfaces for collaborators with this AsyncEventListener.
>     
> SingleIndexRepository - Interface for a single lucene index (in other
> words, a single index on a single bucket for a PR). This currently has
> methods for writing to the index.
>     
> RepositoryManager - interface for obtaining SingleIndexRepository
> objects based on a user region and a key.
>     
> ObjectToDocumentMapper - interface for translating a gemfire object
> into an indexable document.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> gemfire-lucene/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/LuceneEventListener.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> gemfire-lucene/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/repository/ObjectToDocumentMapper.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> gemfire-lucene/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/repository/RepositoryManager.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> gemfire-lucene/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/repository/SingleIndexRepository.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> gemfire-lucene/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/repository/SingleIndexRepositoryImpl.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> gemfire-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/LuceneEventListenerJUnitTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37822/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan Smith
> 
>

Reply via email to