On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > If it really comes to it, we could optimize the xml files as part of the > > build process. So the checked in code would have the comments, > formatting, > > etc. but the version in the jar would be stripped. > > I think this is the bare minimum that could be acceptable. > Seems very strange to remove license headers from whats actually released - the opposite of what I would have said. I assume were talking about the jgroups-config.xml and jgroups-mcast.xml files? I looked at them and I for me these would definitely come under the "a file without any degree of creativity" category. Niall > Thanks, > Roman. >
