The suggested changes are good. Regards, Rajiv Kumar
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:55 PM, pulkit chandra <[email protected]> wrote: > These changes look good. > > Might I suggest another improvement, since we are looking at the function > code. > > Currently we execute the function code in the same thread as the request > which has submitted the function to server. Customer have some times > reached out with issues where we see issues when the function code is stuck > and causes the distributed system to have issues. > > It might be a better design to have a concurrent function execution in its > own thread pool per server which can be monitored. We can have a Java > Future and Executor type behavior in that case. > > My $0.02. > > Cheers, > *Pulkit Chandra* > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Ashvin, Gester and I have gone over our function execution API, and we > have > > some proposals for how we should improve the function service API to make > > it a little bit easier to use. Please take a look at the proposals on the > > wiki and let us know what you think: > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Function+Service+Usability+Improvments > > > > -Dan > > >
