I'd rather have it spelled out with getArguments / setArguments. Thanks, Barry Oglesby GemFire Advanced Customer Engineering (ACE) For immediate support please contact Pivotal Support at http://support.pivotal.io/
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Barry, > > That seems reasonable. What would you prefer - Args or Arguments? > > -Dan > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Barry Oglesby <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > These look good. One small change I would like to see: > > > > Can you make these consistent (either withArguments or getArgs) > > > > Execution: > > > > public Execution withArgs(Object args); > > > > FunctionContext: > > > > public Object getArguments(); > > > > > > Barry Oglesby > > GemFire Advanced Customer Engineering (ACE) > > For immediate support please contact Pivotal Support at > > http://support.pivotal.io/ > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Ashvin, Gester and I have gone over our function execution API, and we > > have > > > some proposals for how we should improve the function service API to > make > > > it a little bit easier to use. Please take a look at the proposals on > the > > > wiki and let us know what you think: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Function+Service+Usability+Improvments > > > > > > -Dan > > > > > >
