-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44548/#review122690
-----------------------------------------------------------




geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/pdx/internal/PdxInstanceImpl.java 
(line 218)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/44548/#comment184793>

    Why not simply initialize dateFormat with the default value then you won't 
need this condition?


- Jens Deppe


On March 9, 2016, 1:47 a.m., Jianxia Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44548/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 9, 2016, 1:47 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Bruce Schuchardt, Hitesh Khamesra, and Udo 
> Kohlmeyer.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Try a different date format which is ISO-8601. Now the date format is 
> configurable by calling PdxInstance.setDateFormat. By default, it is 
> "mm/dd/yyyy".
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-assembly/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/rest/internal/web/controllers/DateTimeUtils.java
>  3a92df3 
>   
> geode-assembly/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/rest/internal/web/controllers/RestAPIsAndInterOpsDUnitTest.java
>  0245fa0 
>   geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/pdx/PdxInstance.java 7f6b831 
>   geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/pdx/internal/EnumInfo.java 
> 1240ad1 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/pdx/internal/PdxInstanceEnum.java
>  90410ee 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/pdx/internal/PdxInstanceImpl.java
>  fa7b961 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/pdx/internal/WritablePdxInstanceImpl.java
>  bb159e7 
>   geode-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/CopyJUnitTest.java 1af9f71 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44548/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jianxia Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to