I think "Pluggable storage" is initiated after Geode Summit. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I found the following"Shepherd/Mentor notes" for our previous report > > <https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2016>: > > > > For the next report: for me as a mentor (and perhaps for others on > IPMC) > > it is not very insightful to see the number of pull requests or JIRAs > > opened. It isn't what "project development" constitutes in my mind. I > > would like to see more info about how project is getting into Apache > > Way, > > what important discussions are held, what decisions are made through > > community consensus, etc. > > That's a good point, but please don't read it as an excuse to drop that > first part of the valuable statistics. > > > Given the above, I was thinking about appending the following to the > report: > > > > - We elected a release manager for the first release and have rotated > that > > responsibility for the second release > > - Had a discussion about how to number the releases > > - Voted on the Release candidates, rejected the first but the second > > release candidate was voted as the final release > > - The community discussed the criteria for becoming a committer and > learned > > the correct way of nominating new committers. > > - JIRA components were refined after a discussion on the mailing list. > > - Consensus was achieved for the scope for the releases on the mailing > list. > > - Decision was made not to rename the command line tool on the mailing > list. > > The above looks very reasonable to me! > > Also, any insights from community development as a follow up to Geode > Summit > would be super useful to include in the report. > > Thanks, > Roman. >
