-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47675/#review134436
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- xiaojian zhou


On May 20, 2016, 10:18 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47675/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 20, 2016, 10:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, anilkumar gingade, Barry Oglesby, Jason Huynh, and 
> xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There were two tests in LuceneIndexRecoveryHAIntegrationTest that used
> disk resources. Moved the overflow test too a LuceneQueriesPersistence
> suite, where it will be cleaned up by the DiskRule.
> 
> The recovery test was pretty much the same as an existing test in
> LuceneIndexCreationPersistent.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/LuceneIndexCreationPersistenceIntegrationTest.java
>  96b4e93eee313ae98fe9af6463b6e9fc3a7b35c3 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesPersistenceIntegrationTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache/lucene/internal/LuceneIndexRecoveryHAIntegrationTest.java
>  d32e6d858b1ee0599f257d5866635c38e0f9946c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47675/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan Smith
> 
>

Reply via email to