Well, you can can replicate clusters over WAN, but as John was saying and as per Mike's clubhouse presentation on WAN <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go9m8fOGZH0&feature=youtu.be>, there are lots of different use cases that WAN opens up like Business unit Active/Passive, Realm manager, follow the sun pattern etc.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Gregory Chase <gch...@pivotal.io> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:53 AM, John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > Hmmm, I disagree. > > > > Second, WAN is much more than Replication. It is a topology used in > > Active-Active or DR architectures, or used perhaps for sending a select > > subset, "filtered" (possibly transformed), information, based on > locality, > > and so on. To refer to WAN as just Replication would do it injustice > IMO. > > > > > Ok - I get you with regard to saving "replication" in the first bullet. > However, I would like a more descriptive word than "WAN" for the latter new > feature. How about "WAN-replication" or "Cluster Replication"? > > -- > Greg Chase > > Global Head, Big Data Communities > http://www.pivotal.io/big-data > > Pivotal Software > http://www.pivotal.io/ > > 650-215-0477 > @GregChase > Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/ >